Funding and Building The "Ike Dike" Funding and Building the "Ike Dike" |
GalvDailyNewsMasthead Bill Sargent, Mark Mansius, and John Gay all ran for Congress in the 2012 Republican Primary. They became friends and have been writing weekly columns for the Galveston County Daily News since May 2013. Bill Sargent, Mark Mansius, and John Gay all ran for Congress in the 2012 Republican Primary. They became friends and have been writing weekly columns for the Galveston County Daily News since May 2013. | |
July 30, 2017 There’s been a lot of work done to prepare for building a coastal barrier system. Texas A&M Galveston has put resources in moving this project forward. The Bay Area Houston Economic Partnership and Texas Land Office’s George P. Bush have also played important roles. Since the ship channel is a “navigable waterway” the responsibility for funding and building an “Ike Dike” falls within federal jurisdiction -- according to the U.S. Constitution. That means it’s not the responsibility of state and local jurisdictions. Over the past months we have read stories about Congressional delegations (CoDels) going to Holland to see how the flood gates will be built. We’ve seen reports on photo-ops related to building an “Ike Dike.” Our observation is that CoDels and photo-ops for local dignitaries do little to help reach a positive legislative outcome; nor does it move the ball down the legislative playing field. So, at the risk of repeating ourselves from August 2014, here’s the approach we suggest. Find a congressman to introduce a bill that mandates:
This approach requires having a person in Congress who will champion the effort; someone who can forge relationships and work across party lines to move the measure forward to final passage. Now, compare our approach to what actually happened. Last year language was placed in the WINN Act that says: “Section 1205 Texas Coastal Area: In carrying out the comprehensive plan authorized by … Public Law 110-114… the (Army) Secretary shall consider studies; data, and information developed by the Gulf Coast Community Protection and Recovery District to expedite completion of the plan.” Which approach gets the job done? Section 1205 does little to get the coastal barrier system actually built! The time for political theater, photo-ops, and legislation that does little is over. We need dedicated congressional leadership that can forge relationships across party lines and convince colleagues this is a national (not a regional) economic and national security issue. Let’s get it done; before the next hurricane! Related Columns: March 2014 | August 2014 | September 2016
|